# Author or just ‘acknowledged’? How women are not gaining full credit for research

Source: [nature.com](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03448-7) · 2026-11-11 · Life
Page: https://themorning.science/story/author-or-just-acknowledged-how-women-are-not-gaining-full-credit-for-research-8d1beec6ebca6c79
Kind: research · Impact: medium

## In brief

- A Nature article published 11 November 2026 analyses who is more likely to receive authorship rather than only acknowledgement for research work.
- The analysis highlights the influence of a researcher's gender and status on which credit they receive.

## Why it matters

Authorship is the main formal record of contribution, so if women are more often acknowledged rather than named as authors, their work may be under-credited in publications and careers.

## Timeline

- 2026-11-11: Nature publishes analysis of authorship versus acknowledgement for women researchers

## Coverage

- [Author or just ‘acknowledged’? How women are not gaining full credit for research](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03448-7) — nature.com, 2026-11-11

Tags: authorship, gender, research-credit, academia, research-ethics

---

Brief generated by AI (claude-haiku-5-5) from the reporting listed under Coverage. Headlines belong to their publishers. The Morning Science – https://themorning.science
